Desagregação e compartilhamento do uso de rede de telecomunicações
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Unbundling quer dizer desenfeixamento; bundle , em inglês, corresponde a fascia, feixe, em latim. O verbo to bundle, enfeixar, encontra o seu contrário pela adição do prefixo un, e o vocábulo assim composto, acrescido do sufixo ing, forma o gerúndio desse verbo, de onde provêm o substantivo unbundling. Na linguagem específica de telecomunicações, optou-se pelo vocábulo desagregação como versão do vocábulo inglês, e em francês degroupage, desagrupamento.
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Referências
ANTITRUST law developments. 4. ed. Chicago: American Bar Association, 1997. v. I. p. 275, 276, 277 e 282.
AREEDA, Phillip. “Essential facilities: an epithet in need of limiting principles”. Antitrust Law Journal, v. 58, 1989-90, p. 841 e segs.
“AT&T Corp. et al. v. Iowa Utilities Board et al.” - certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the eighth circuit - No. 97-826. Argued October 13, 1998 - Decided January 25, 1999.
BARCELLONA, Pietro. “Diritto privato e processo economico”. Napole, 1974. p. 179 e 180, apud Ana Prata em A tutela constitucional da autonomia privada. Coimbra, 1982, p. 163.
BERGMAN, Mats. A. “The Bronner Case - A turning point for the essential facilities doctrine?”. European Competition Law Review, v. 21, n. 2, fevereiro de 2000, p. 59 e 63.
BERTI, Iacopo; BIANCARDI, Alberto. “Essential facility e disciplina della concorrenza: osservazioni e note critiche”. Concorrenza e Mercato, Milão: Giuffrè Editore, 4/1996, p. 447.
BEUSOUSSAN, Alain. “Le service universal permet d’organiser um droit au téléphone pour tous à um prix abordable”. In: Télécom – aspects juridiques. s.l.: Hermes, 1998, p. 39.
BISHOP, Simon; WALKER, Mike. The Economics of EC Competition Law. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1999, p. 115.
Cincinnati Bell Telephone, et al. v. FCC, et al. 1995 FED App. 0326P (6th Cir.) - Nos. 94-3701/4113; 95-3023/3238/3315.
“Commission’s Notice on the Application of the Competition Rules to Access Agreements in Telecommunications Sector” – “Access Notice”, 1998, OJ. C265/2.
Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin v. Marshfield Clinic, 65 F.3d 1406 (7th Cir. 1995). In: Antitrust Law, v. IIIA, 1996, p. 203, nota 16.
GLASL, Daniel. “Essential facilities doctrine in EC anti-trust law: a contribution to the current debate”. European Competition Law Review, v. 15, n. 1, janeiro/fevereiro de 1994, p. 312.
HOVENKAMP, Herbert. “Antitrust and Federal Regulatory Policy”. In: Federal Antitrust Policy - The law of competition and its practice. s.l., 1994, p. 658.
KNIEPS, Günter. “Costing and pricing in liberalized telecommunications markets”. In: Competition and regulation in telecommunications - Examining Germany and America. Edição de J. Gregory Sidak, Christoph Engel, Günter Knieps. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, p. 43.
MACAVOY, Paul W.; SIDAK, Gregory J. “What is wrong with American telecommunications?”. In: Competition and regulation in telecommunications - Examining Germany and America. Edição de J. Gregory Sidak, Christoph Engel, Günter Knieps. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001, p. 72 e 73.
MOGLIA, Giovanni G.; DURANTE, Domenico. “Le essential facility e la creazione di nuovi mercato concorrenziali: recenti sviluppi tra antitrust e regolamentazione”. Concorrenza e Mercato, Milão: Giuffrè, 1999, p. 303-304.
NIKOLINAKOS, Nikos Th. “Access Agreements in the Telecommunications Sector - Refusal to Supply and the Essential Facilities Doctrine under E.C. Competition Law”. European Competition Law Review, v. 20, n. 8, dezembro de 1999, p. 405.
NOTICE on the application of the competition rules to access agreements in the telecommunications sector: FRAMEWORK, RELEVANT MARKETS AND PRINCIPLES. In: Official Journal of the European Communities, 22.8.98, c265/02.
OVERD, Alan; BISHOP, Bill. “Essential Facilities: the Rising Tide”. European Competition Law Review, v. 19, 1998, p. 183.
OWEN, Bruce M. “Determining optimal access to regulated essential facilities”. Antitrust Law Journal, v. 58, 1989-90, p. 890.
SARAIVA, F. R. dos Santos. Novíssimo Diccionario Latino-Portuguez. 5ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: H. Garnier, 1905, p. 474/5.
THE OXFORD Dictionary of English Etymology. Editado por C. T. Onions. Oxford, 1966, p. 126.
TOFFOLETTI, Luca. “La nozione di essential facility”. Concorrenza e Mercato, Giuffrè Editore, v. 6, 1998, p. 331 e 335.
TRAN THIET, Jean-Paul. Télécommunications! Nouvelle Donne. Paris: Les Éditions d’Organisation, 1997, p. 55.
WATSON, Christopher; WHEADON, Tom. Telecommunications - the EU law. Bembridge: Palladian Law, 1999, p. 36.