Poder de portfólio em concentrações econômicas preocupações e desdobramentos
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Este artigo pretende trazer um panorama geral da análise empreendida pelo Cade em atos de concentração que levantem preocupações relacionadas à criação de efeitos conglomerados e, principalmente, de poder de portfólio. Para tal, apresenta-se a teoria do dano que mais recorrentemente é empregada para justificar a análise das autoridades concorrenciais sobre estas estruturas empresariais em sede de controle de concentrações, e se indica que, dada esta aparente escolha de política de defesa da concorrência, é mais coerente que preocupações relacionadas a poder de portfólio sejam deixadas ao controle repressivo de condutas.
Downloads
Article Details
References
BOGUS, C. The New Road to Serfdom: The Curse of Bigness and the Failure of Antitrust, University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, n. 49, 2015.
BORK, R. Goals of Antitrust: A Dialogue on Crisis, 1965.
BUNDESKARTELLAMT, Conglomerate Mergers in Merger Control: Review and Prospects, Discussion Paper for the meeting of the Working Group on Competition Law on 21 September 2006.
CADE, Ato de Concentração nº 08700.005937/2016-61.
CADE, Ato de Concentração nº. 08700.001324/2018-17.
CADE, Ato de Concentração nº. 08700.004446/2017-84.
CADE, Ato de Concentração nº. 08700.008483/2016-81.
EUROPEAN COMISSION, Guidelines on the assessment of non-horizontal mergers under the Council Regulation on the control of concentrations between undertakings.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Case M.5884 – Intel/MacAfee (2011).
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Case M.8084 – Bayer/Monsanto (2017).
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Case M.8394 – Exilor/Luxotica (2017).
FIRST, H. Woodstock Antitrust, Antitrust Chronicle, Competition Policy International, 2018, p. 58.
GINSBURG, D. H., WRIGHT, J. D., Dynamic Analysis and the Limits of Antitrust Institutions, Antitrust Law Journal, V. 78, N. 1, 2012.
GUERRERA, F. Decline sets in at the conglomerate, Financial Times, 2007, disponível em https://www.ft.com/content/58d234f0-b48c-11db-b707-0000779e2340.
HOVENKAMP, H. Antitrust Policy and Inequality of Wealth, University of Pennsylvania Law School, Faculty Scholarship. 1769, 2017.
KAHN, L. Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox. The Yale Law Journal v. 126, n. 3, January 2017.
KATZ, M.; SHELANSKY, H. Shumpeterian Competition And Antitrust Policy In High Tech Markets Competition, Vol. 14, p. 47, 2005.
KHAN, L. Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox, Yale Law Journal, 2016.
KHAN, L. The New Brandeis Movement: America’s Antimonopoly Debate. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, Volume 9, Issue 3, 1 March 2018, Pages 131–132.
KOLASKY, William J. Conglomerate Mergers and Range Effects: It's a Long Way from Chicago to Brussels. Address before the George Mason University Symposium, 2001.
LEON, I., Latin American Competition Policy: From Nirvana Antitrust Policy to Reality-Based Institutional Competition Building, Chicago-Kent Law Review, V.39, 2007.
LIM, Y. Tech wars: return of the conglomerate: Throwback or dawn of a new series for competition in the digital era?, 2017.
MARKOVITS, R.S., Economics and the Interpretation and Application of U.S. and E.U. Antitrust Law, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014.
MCGOWAN, D. Innovation, Uncertainty, and Stability in Antitrust Law, 2013, pp. 741-756.
OECD, Portfolio Effects in Conglomerate Mergers, 24-jan-2002, p. 7.
ORBACH, B., Rebling, G. C. The Antitrust Curse of Business, Southern California Law Review, v. 85, p. 605, 2012.
POSNER, R. Conglomerate Mergers and The Antitrust Policy: An Introduction, St. John’s Law Review, V. 44, 1969.
SALOMÃO FILHO, C. Direito Concorrencial, São Paulo: Malheiros, 2013.
SHAPIRO, C. Antitrust in a Time of Populism, 2017.
SIDAK, G.; TEECE, D. Dynamic Competition in Antitrust Law. Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 5(4), p. 593.
SPIVACK, G. B. Conglomerate Mergers and the Antitrust Laws, Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship Series, Paper 4111., 1970, disponível em http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/4111.