Public compensation in Brazilian Competition law a mechanism to enhance the effectiveness of enforcement

Barra lateral del artículo

PDF (English)
Publicado: jul 9, 2025
Palabras clave:
competition law, public enforcement, private enforcement, compensation, collective redress, public compensation

Contenido principal del artículo

Adriano Camargo Gomes

Resumen

This paper has as its object the improvement of the Brazilian system of Competition law, through the institutionalisation of a mechanism by which public enforcement could perform compensational tasks (public compensation). Starting with a diagnostic of the inefficiencies of the private enforcement system, arguments in favour of adopting public compensation in Brazil will be presented. Following that. this paper will draw on an analysis of legislation and case-law to argue that public compensation is compatible with the Brazilian legal system. Finally, it will consider how public compensation should be institutionalised, presenting a possible institutional framework for public compensation.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Detalles del artículo

Cómo citar
Gomes, A. C. (2025). Public compensation in Brazilian Competition law: a mechanism to enhance the effectiveness of enforcement. Revista Do IBRAC, 26(21), 155–173. Recuperado a partir de https://revista.ibrac.org.br/index.php/revista/article/view/1415
Número
Vol. 26 Núm. 21 (2014)
Sección
Artigos para Revista do IBRAC
Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.

Biografía del autor/a

Adriano Camargo Gomes

Mestre em Direito pela Universidade de Oxford (2014). Doutorando em Direito Processual na USP.
Intercambista do Pincade (2011/2012). Advogado.

Citas

ANEEL. Aneel determina restituição aos consumidores da Eletropaulo. 17 dez. 2013. Disponível em: [www.aneel.gov.br/aplicacoes/noticias/Output_Noticias.cfm?Identidade=7623&id_area=]. Acesso em: 9 jan. 2014.

BBC NEWS. Brazil orange juice probe goes on. 23 nov. 2006. Disponível em: [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/6176178.stm]. Acesso em: 9 jan. 2014.

SISTEMA OCEPAR. Indenização: Indústrias de citrus concordam em pagar R$ 100 milhões. 24 ago. 2006. Disponível em: [www.paranacooperalivo.coop.br/ppc/index.php/sistema-ocepar/comunicacao/2011-12-07-11-06-29/ultimasnoticias/34119-34119]. Acesso em: 9 jan. 2014.

AMORE, R.; FOER, A. Cy Pres as an antitrust remedy. 2005. (AAI Working Paper 05/09). Disponível em: [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=l 103595]. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2014.

ARENHART, Sérgio Cruz. Decisões estruturais no direito processual brasileiro. RePro 225/389. São Paulo: Ed. RT, 2013.

BIS. Private actions in Competition law: A consultation on options for reform. abr. 2012. (‘BIS Consultation’). Disponível em: [www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/consumer-issues/docs/p/12-742-privateactions-in-competition-law-consultation.pdf]. Acesso em: 15 dez. 2013.

CANENBLEY, C.; STEINVORTH T. Effective enforcement of Competition law: Is there a solution to the conflict between leniency programmes and private damages actions? (2011) 2 J Eur CL&P 315.

CAPPELLETTI, Mauro; GARTH, B. Access to justice: a world survey. Giuffrè, 1978.

COMISSÃO EUROPEIA. Damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules. (Green Paper) COM (2005) 672 final, 19 dez. 2005.

COMISSÃO EUROPEIA. Quantifying harm in actions for damages based on breaches of articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. (Draft guidance paper. Public consultation, June 2011). Disponível em: [http://ec.europa.eu/competition/consultations/2011_actions_damages/draft_guidance_paper_en.pdf]. Acesso em: 22 jan. 2014.

ELHAUGE, E. Disgorgement as an antitrust remedy. (2009) 76 ALJ 79.

EZRACHI, A.; IOANNIDOU, M. Public compensation as a complementary mechanism to damages actions: From policy Justifications to formal implementation. (2012) 3 J Eur CL&P 536.

FDD. Nota - Relacionamos abaixo os valores recolhidos ao FDD, de acordo com suas finalidades até o dia 31.12.2013. [2014]. Disponível em: [http://portal.mj.gov.br/services/DocumentManagement/FileDownload.EZTSvc.asp?DocumentID={2E9C42A4-DF21-4C71-AB15-D54A6BF74B01}&ServicelnstUlD=[59D015FA-30D3-48EE-B12402A314CB7999)]. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2014.

GABAN, E.; DOMINGUES, J. Brazilian competition law: A practitioner's guide. Kluwer Law International, 2013.

GIDI, A. Class actions in Brazil. (2003) 51 AJCL 311.

GRIMBERG, M.; PAOLETTI, C.; CORDOVIL, L. Brazil. In: FOER, Albert; CUNEO, Jonathan (eds.). The international handbook on private enforcement of Competition law. Edward Elgar, 2010.

HOOD, C. Explaining economic policy reversals. Open University Press, 1994.

IBA. Formulário de sugestões - Consulta Pública 17. [2011]. Disponível em: [http://cade.gov.br/upload/IBA.pdf]. Acesso em: 9 jan. 2014.

IBRAC. Formulário de sugestões - Consulta Pública 17. [2011]. Disponível em: [http://cade.gov.br/upload/IBRAC.pdf]. Acesso em: 9 jan. 2014.

IOANNIDOU, M. Enhancing the consumers. Role in EU Private competition law enforcement: A normative and practical approach. (2012) 8 Comp. L. Rev. 59.

KOMNINOS, A. EC private antitrust enforcement: decentralised application of EC competition law by national courts. Hart Publishing, 2008.

MARINONI, Luiz Guilherme. Precedentes obrigatórios. 2. ed. São Paulo: Ed. RT, 2010.

MARINONI, Luiz Guilherme. Técnica processual e tutela dos direitos. 3. ed. São Paulo: Ed. RT, 2010.

OAB-DE. Formulário de sugestões - Consulta pública 17. [2011]. Disponível em: [http://cade.gov.br/upload/CCOAB%20DEpdf]. Acesso em: 9 jan. 2014.

OAB-SP. Formulário de sugestões - Consulta pública 17. [2011]. Disponível em: [http://cade.gov.br/upload/CECORE.pdf]. Acesso em: 9 jan. 2014.

OECD. Policy brief - Competition law and policy in Brazil. [2005]. Disponível em: [www.seae.fazenda.gov.br/destaque_ingles/brazilpolbrieffinal.pdf]. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2013.

OECD. Competition law and policy in Brazil - A peer review. [2010]. Disponível em: [www.oecd.org/daí7competition/45154362.pdf]. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2013.

OTTA, L.; FROUFE, C. Super Cade terá mais poderes que a PE. Estado de São Paulo. Brasília, 7 out. 2011. Disponível em: [www.estadao.com.br/noticias/impresso,super-cadetera-mais-poderes-que-a-pf-,782254,0.htm]. Acesso em: 9 jan. 2014.

PAGOTTO, L. Are the brazilian competition authorities being responsive? An analysis based on the Benign Big Gun Model. (2006) 29 WC 285.

RAGAZZO, C.; SILVA, R. Aspectos econômicos e jurídicos sobre cartéis na revenda de combustíveis: uma agenda para investigações. (2006) SEAE - Documento de trabalho 40. Disponível em: [www.seae.fazenda.gov.br/central-de-documentos/documentos-detrabalho/documentos-de-trabalho-2006/DT_40.pdf]. Acesso em: 9 jan. 2014.

ROBERTSON, A. UK competition litigation: From Cinderella to Goldilocks? [2010]. Comp Law 275.

SDE. Consulta Pública 17. [2011]. Disponível em: [www.cade.gov.br/upload/consultal7_2011.pdf]. Acesso em: 11 nov. 2013.

WAGNER, G. Collective redress - Categories of loss and legislative options. (2011) 127 LQR 55.

WILS, W. The relationship between public antitrust enforcement and private actions for damages. (2009) 32 WC 3.

ZUCKERMAN, A. Civil litigation: a public Service for the enforcement of civil rights. (2007) 26 CJQ