Além dos fundamentos jurídicos e microeconômicos um modelo de análise estrutural de julgamentos de atos de concentração

Main Article Content

Márcio Roberto Moran
Anju Seth

Abstract

Este estudo propõe um Modelo de Análise Estrutural de Julgamentos de Atos de Concentração, com o intuito de facilitar a compreensão e a previsibilidade, por agentes econômicos e pesquisadores, do fenômeno dos julgamentos antitruste. Adicionalmente, o referido modelo subsidia de informação os reguladores, com vistas à promoção da estabilidade de marcos
legais. Além da proposição teórica, um teste empírico de robustez é apresentado, utilizando-se de regressões de probabilidade Probit Ordenado e de um banco de dados próprio, que cobre catorze anos de regulacão antitruste no Brasil e contém 4.616 votos de 36 conselheiros do CADE sobre 775 Fusões e Aquisições.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Moran, M. R., & Seth, A. (2023). Além dos fundamentos jurídicos e microeconômicos: um modelo de análise estrutural de julgamentos de atos de concentração. Revista Do IBRAC, 22(2), 281–306. Retrieved from https://revista.ibrac.org.br/index.php/revista/article/view/143
Section
Artigos para Revista do IBRAC

References

AKTAS, N.; De BODT, E.; ROLL, R. Market response to European regulation of business combinations. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, v. 39, n. 4, p. 731-757, 2004.

AKTAS, N.; De BODT, E.; ROLL, R. Is European M&A Regulation protectionist? The Economic Journal, v. 1, p. 1096-1121, 2007.

AVALOS, M.; DE HOYOS, R. E. An empirical analysis of Mexican merger policy. Review of Industrial Organization, v. 32, n. 1, p. 113-130, 2008.

AVELLAR, A. P.; TEIXEIRA, H. de A.; DE PAULA, G. M. Joint ventures e a política antitruste brasileira. Revista de Economia Contemporânea, v. 16, n. 3, p. 463-486, 2012.

BERGMAN, M. A.; JAKOBSSON, M.; RAZO, C. An econometric analysis of the European Commission’s merger decisions. International Journal of Industrial Organization, v. 23, p. 717-737, 2005.

BREUNIG, R.; MENEZES, F. M.; TAN, K. J. K. An empirical investigation of the mergers decision process in Australia. The Economic Record, v. 88, n. 283, p. 459-475, 2012.

COATE, M. B. A test of political control of the bureaucracy: the case of mergers. Economics and Politics, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-18, 2002.

COATE, M. B. Empirical analysis of merger enforcement under the 1992 merger guidelines. Review of Industrial Organization, v. 27, p. 279-301, 2005.

COATE, M. B. The shifting sands of merger enforcement at the Federal Trade Commission. International Journal of the Economics of Business, v. 2, n. 3, p. 393-407, 1995.

COATE, M. B.; HIGGINS, R. S.; MC CHESNEY, F. S. Bureaucracy and politics in FTC merger challenges. Journal of Law and Economics, v. 33, n. 2, p. 463-482, 1990.

COATE, M. B.; KLEIT, A. N. Art of the deal: the merger settlement process at the Federal Trade Commission. Southern Economic Journal, v. 70, n. 4, p. 977-997, 2004.

COATE, M. B.; KLEIT, A. N.; BUSTAMANTE, R. Fight, fold or settle? Modeling the reaction to FTC merger challenges. Economic Inquiry, v. XXXIII, p. 537-551, 1995.

COATE, M. B.; MC CHESNEY, F. S. Empirical evidence on FTC enforcement of the merger guidelines. Economic Inquiry, v. XXX, p. 277-293, April 1992.

COATE, M. B.; ULRICK, S. W. Transparency at the Federal Trade Commission: the horizontal merger review process 1996-2003. Bureau of Economics Federal Trade Commission, Economic Issues, p. 1-81, 2005.

COATE, M. B.; ULRICK, S. W. Transparency at the Federal Trade Commission: the horizontal merger review process 1996-2003. Antitrust Law Journal, v. 73, n. 2, p. 531-570, 2006.

CONKLIN, D. W.; POCKLINGTON JR., P. H. 2014. Antitrust: a threat to mergers and acquisitions. Ivey Business Journal, v. 64, n. 6, p. 38-42, 2000.

DE LEON, I. Latin American Competition Law and Policy: a policy in search of identity. Kluwer Law International, 2001. 300 p.

DEVOS, E.; KADAPAKKAM, P-R.; KRISHNAMURTHY, S. How do mergers create value? A comparison of taxes, market power, and efficiency improvements as explanations for synergies. The Review of Financial Studies, v. 22, n. 3, 2009.

DOJ – U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE. Antitrust Division policy guide to merger remedies. June 2011.

DUSO, T.; GUGLER, K. J.; YURTOGLU, B. B. How effective is European merger control? European Economic Review, v. 55, p. 980-1006, 2011.

DUSO, T.; NEVEN, D. J.; ROLLER, L. The political economy of European merger control: evidence using stock market data. Journal of Law and Economics, v. 50, n. 3, p. 455-489, 2007.

EREL, I. The effect of bank mergers on loan prices: evidence from the United States. The Review of Financial Studies, v. 24, n. 4, p. 1068-1101, 2011.

EVANS, D. S. Lightening up on market definition. In: ELHAUGE, E. R. Research Handbook on the Economics of Antitrust Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2012, cap. 3, p. 53-89.

FAGUNDES, J. Políticas de defesa da concorrência e política industrial: convergência ou divergência? Revista IBRAC, v. 5, n. 6, 1998.

FINKELSTEIN, C.; FINKELSTEIN, M. E. A internacionalização do direito econômico. In: GABAN, E. M.; DOMINGUES, J. O. Estudos de direito econômico e economia da concorrência. Curitiba: Juruá, 2012, cap. 8, p. 137-146.

FTC – FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Disponível em: https://www.ftc.gov/policy/international/competition-consumer-protection-authorities-worldwide. Acessos: 2015-2016.

GAMA, M. M. da; RUIZ, R. M. A práxis antitruste no Brasil: uma análise do CADE no período 1994-2004. Economia e Sociedade, v. 16, n. 2, p. 233-258, 2007.

GABAN, E. M.; DOMINGUES, J. O. Direito antitruste: o combate aos cartéis. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2009. 364 p.

GARSIDE, L.; GROUT, P. A.; ZALEWSKA, A. Does experience make you 'tougher'? Evidence from competition law. The Economic Journal, v. 123, p. 474-490, 2013.

GERSHON, L. Study: industries with low barriers to entry. Disponível em: https://www.creditdonkey.com/barriers-to-entry.html. Acessos em: junho de 2016.

HORN, H.; STENNEK, J. The political economy of EU merger control: small vs. large member States. In: GHOSAL, V.; STENNEK, J. Contributions to economic analysis: the political economy of antitrust. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2007, p. 259-285.

KHEMANI, R. S.; SHAPIRO, D. M. An empirical analysis of Canadian merger policy. The Journal of Industrial Economics, v. XLI, n. 2, 1993.

KIRKWOOD, John B. The predictive power of merger analysis. The Antitrust Bulletin, v. 56, n. 3, p. 543-582, Fall 2011.

KOPKE, A.; KRAAK, K.; LEVIE, D.; MENEZES, J.; PLAS, S.; TRETTON, W. Merger Remedies Study. Directorate General for Competition of the European Commission, p. 1-233, 2005.

KRATTENMAKER, T. G.; PITOFSKY, R. Antitrust Merger Policy and the Reagan Administration. The Antitrust Bulletin, p. 211-232, Summer 1988.

LA NOCE, M.; BOLASCO, S.; ALLEGRA, E.; RUOCCO, V.; CAPO, F. M. Merger control in Italy 1995–2003: a statistical study of the enforcement practice by mining the text of authority resolutions. International Journal of the Economics of Business, v. 13, n. 2, p. 307-334, 2006.

LEDDY, M. Recent merger cases reflect revolution in Antitrust Policy. Legal Times, p. 2, 1986.

LONG, W. F.; SCHRAMM, R.; TOLLISON, R. The economic determinants of antitrust activity. The Journal of Law and Economics, v. 16, n. 2, p. 351-364, 1973.

MCAFEE, R. P.; VAKKUR, N. V. The Strategic abuse of the antitrust laws. Journal of Strategic Management Education, v. 1, n. 3, p. 1-18, 2004.

MELLO, M. T. L. Defesa da concorrência. In: KUPFER, D.; HASENCLEVER, L. Economia Industrial: fundamentos teóricos e práticas no Brasil. Rio Janeiro: Elsevier, 2002, cap. 21, p. 485-514.

MINTZBERG, H. Managing government, governing management. Harvard Business Review, v. 74, n. 3, p. 75-83, May-June 1996.

MOE, T. M. Regulatory Performance and Presidential Administration. American Journal of Political Science, v. 26, n. 2, p. 197-224, 1982.

MONTI, G. EC Competition Law. Cambridge: University Press, 2007.

MORAN, M. R.; SETH, A.; FISCHMANN, A. A. Does antitrust commission structure bias merger reviews? The case of Brazil. Discussion paper, INSEAD, France, 2016.

MOTTA, M.; POLO, M.; VASCONCELOS, H.. Merger remedies in the European Union: an overview. In: LÉVÊQUE, F.; SHELANKSI, H. Merger remedies in American and European Union competition law. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, 2003, p. 106-128.

NUSDEO, A. M. de O. Defesa da concorrência e globalização econômica: o controle da concentração de empresas. São Paulo: Malheiros Editores, 2002.

O'BRIEN, R. M. A caution regarding rules of thumb for Variance Inflation Factors. Quality & Quantity, v. 41, n. 1, p. 673-690, 2007.

OECD – Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Market Definition. Paris: OECD, 2012. 440 p.

OLIVEIRA, G.. Defesa da concorrência, investimento estrangeiro e desnacionalização: aspectos da experiência brasileira recente. In: OLIVEIRA, G. Concorrência: panorama no Brasil e no mundo. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2001, cap. 6, p. 118-134.

STINE, R. A. Graphical interpretation of Variance Inflation Factors. The American Statistician, v. 49, n. 1, p. 53-56, 1995.

POSNER, R. A. The Federal Trade Commission. The University of Chicago Law Review, v. 37, n. 1, p. 47-89, Autumn 1969.

QUIRK, P. Industry influence in federal regulatory agencies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981. 260 p.

SALOP, Steven C. Symposium on Mergers and Antitrust. The Journal of Economic Perspectives. v. 1, n. 2, p. 3-12, Autumn 1987.

SCHEFFMAN, D.; COATE, M. B.; SILVIA, L. Twenty years of merger guidelines enforcement at the FTC: an economic perspective. Antitrust Law Journal, v. 71, p. 277-318, 2003.

SIEGFRIED, J. J. The Determinants of Antitrust Activity. The Journal of Law & Economics, v. 18, n. 2, p. 559-574, 1975.

SHETH, M. M. Formulating antitrust policy in emerging economies. The Georgetown Law Journal, v. 86, n. 1, p. 451-477, 1997.

SINGH, A. Competition and competition policy in emerging markets: international and developmental dimensions. G-24 Discussion Paper Series, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, n. 18, September 2002.

STATA. Stepwise estimation. Disponível em: http://www.stata.com/manuals13/rstepwise.pdf. Acessos: junho de 2016.

STEWART, J.; CROMARTIE, J. S. Partisan presidential change and regulatory policy: the case of the FTC and deceptive practices enforcement, 1938-1974. Presidential Studies Quarterly, v. 12, n. 4, p. 568-573, 1982.

SCOTT, R. Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995.

STRONG, N.; BOLLARD, A.; PICKFORD, M. Defining market dominance: a study of antitrust decisions on business acquisitions in New Zealand. Review of Industrial Organization, v. 17, p. 209-227, 2000.

WEIR, C. Monopolies and Merger Commission, merger reports and the public interest: a probit analysis. Applied Economics, v. 24, p. 27-34, 1992.

WEIR, C. Merger policy and competition: an analysis of the Monopolies and Merger Commission's decisions. Applied Economics, v. 25, p. 57-66, 1993.

WHITE, L. J. Antitrust and merger police: a review and critique. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 1, n. 2, p. 12-23, 1987.

WOOLDRIDGE, J. M. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. South-Western: Cengage, 2009. 865 p.

WORLD BANK. Worldwide Governance Indicators. Disponível em: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home. Acessos: junho de 2016.

ZHENG, W. The revolving door. Notre Dame Law Review, v. 90, n. 3, p. 1265-1308, 2015.