Implicações do regime de falências no direito concorrencial
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This paper is aimed at studying the correlations between the corporate recovery and antitrust regimes, with focus on the influence
of the first over the last. We study the foreign experience and the Brazilian studies on the matter, and conclude that the Brazilian experience on the matter is still incipient. We propose some ways to analyze the mteractions between the regimes, studying some of these reciprocai influences, and presenting suggestions to the analysis of mergers, as well as changes to the present corporate recovery regime, with the objective of harmonization of both
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Aqui estão as referências formatadas conforme solicitado:
ARAÚJO, Valter Schuenquener. O (indispensável) papel do Cade nos atos de concentração previstos em planos de recuperação. Revista Semestral de Direito Empresarial RSDE 2. p. 73-92. jan. e jun. 2008.
CAMPINHO, Sérgio. Atos de concentração no plano de recuperação judicial: participação obrigatória ou facultativa do Cade. Revista de Direito Empresarial e Recuperacional. ano I. n. 0. p. 103-124. Florianópolis, jan.-mar. 2010.
COMISSÃO EUROPEIA. Community guidelines on State Aid for rescuing and restructuring firms in difficulty. Official Journal C 244, 01.10.2004, p. 2-17. Disponível em: [eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52004XC1001(01):EN:NOT]. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2013.
COMISSÃO EUROPEIA. Guidelines on the assessment of horizontal mergers under the Council Regulation on the control of concentrations between undertakings. Official Journal C 31, 05.02.2004, p. 5-18. Disponível em: [http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52004XC0205(02):EN:NOT]. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2013.
JANAITIS, James A. Bankruptcy Collides With Antitrust: The Need For A Prohibilion Against Using § 1110 Protections Colleclively. Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal, vol. 25. Number 1. p. 197-236. Atlanta: Emory Universily School of Law, 2008.
NORRIS, Lauren N. The Failing Finn Defense in American Bar Association Young Lawyers Division - The 101 Practice Series: Breaking Down the Basics. Publicação apenas via internet. Disponível em: [www.klgates.com/files/Publication/lae9felf-ab0e-49cb-852700ac4fc754e7/Presentation/PublicationAttachmeni/9cld5211-abbf-4217-a7ea0756cc43cl92/Norris_FailingFirmDefense.pdf]. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2013.
OCDE. Roundtable on failing firm defence. Documento n. DAF/COMP(2009)38. Disponível em: [www.oecd.org/competition/mergers/45810821.pdf]. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2013.
OCDE. Competition Policy in Subsidies and State Aid. Documento n. DAFFE/CLP(2001)24. Disponível em: [www.oecd.org/compctition/abuse/2731940.pdfl. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2013.
SALOMÃO FILHO, Calixto. Direito concorrencial: as estruturas. 2. ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2002.
SCHUMPETER, Joseph A. Capitalismo, socialismo e democracia. Rio de Janeiro: Fundo de Cultura, 1961.
ULHOA COELHO, Fábio. Curso de direito comercial. Direito de empresa. 10. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2009. vol. 3.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE & FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION. Horizontal Merger Guidelines, 1997. Disponível em: [www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/hmg.htm]. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2013.