Cláusulas arbitrais assimétricas em contratos comerciais internacionais nível de receptividade e implicações concorrenciais
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The aim of the research is to examine, through bibliographic review and quantitative analysis, the factual and legal arguments
concerning the validity and effectiveness of asymmetric arbitration clauses (AACs). By enabling one of the disputing parties to unilaterally select the state or arbitral jurisdiction, asymmetric clauses accentuate relevant divergences on the scope of equal treatment and call into question the extent to which advantages in the procedural sphere are translated into material benefits in the arbitration award. In this sense, the research will address the main doctrinal and jurisprudential opinions on the topic, establishing points of dialogue with the principles and institutes of Competition Law.
Article Details
References
BARRIOS, Lucas de Góis; LAPA, Vitória Neffá. Arbitragem e direito concorrencial: ordem pública, confidencialidade e atuação dos árbitros. Revista de Defesa da Concorrência, Brasília, v. 9, n. 1, p. 148-172, 2021. DOI: 10.52896/rdc.v9i1.908. Disponível em: https://revista.cade.gov.br/index.php/revistadedefesadaconcorrencia/article/view/908. Acesso em: 20/07/2022.
BORN, Gary B. International Arbitration: Law and Practice. Kluwer Law International, 2016, pp. 34-39.
CARMONA, Carlos Alberto. Arbitragem e Processo: um comentário à Lei 9.307/96. 3ª Ed. São Paulo: Editora Atlas S.A., 2009, pp. 64-65.
CLIFFORD CHANCE. Unilateral Option Clauses Survey. 2021. Disponível em: https://www.cliffordchance.com/content/dam/cliffordchance/briefings/2021/02/clifford-chance-unilateral-option-clauses-survey-2021.pdf. Acesso em: 20/05/2022.
DORWARD, Daniel J. The forum non conveniens doctrine and the judicial protection of multinational corporations from forum shopping plaintiffs. Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository, 2014.
DRAGUEIV, Deyan. Unilateral Jurisdiction Clauses: The Case for Invalidity, Severability or Enforceability. Journal of International Arbitration 31, no. 1 (2014), pp. 19–46.
EIRAS, L. Sham Litigation: requisitos para sua configuração. Revista de Defesa da Concorrência, Brasília, v. 7, n. 2, p. 53-75, 2019. Disponível em: https://revista.cade.gov.br/index.php/revistadedefesadaconcorrencia/article/view/423. Acesso em: 10/07/2022.
FRAZÃO, Ana. Questões concorrenciais podem ser resolvidas pela arbitragem? Tema está a merecer um maior aprofundamento. 2018. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/3olR1dg. Acesso em: 01/07/2022.
LIGKANAYA, Jovanka; ADOLF, Huala; AMALIA, Prita. Asymmetrical Arbitration Clauses: A Comparative Study of International and Indonesian Arbitration Law. Pandecta, Volume 16. Number 1. June 2021 Page 130-147.
NIDDAM, L. Unilateral Arbitration Clauses in Commercial Arbitration. Arbitration and Dispute Resolution Law Journal. 1996.
ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMICS CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (OECD). Arbitration and Competition 2010: Hearings. Note by the Secretariat. DAF/COMP (2010)40. Paris: OECD, 2011. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/3uT9y32. Acesso em: 02/07/2022.
PATIL, Salonee. Unilateral Option Clauses: The Way Forward. Christ University Law Journal 2018, Vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 45-62.
REINO UNIDO. Corte de Apelação do Reino Unido. Pittalis v. Sherefetin. QB 868. 1986.
RÚSSIA. Suprema Corte da Federação Russa. Sony Ericsson Communications Rus (Russia) v Russian Telephone Company. No. 1831/12. Junho, 2012.
SOLEMINE, Michael E. The Quiet Revolution in Personal Jurisdiction, 73 TUL. L. REv. 1, 12. 1998.
STJ. Recurso Especial nº 1.940.072/AM. Rel. Min. Marco Aurélio Bellizze. Decisão Monocrática de 03/08/2021.
STRUZHKO, Aleksandr. Asymmetrical Arbitration Agreement: Validity and Enforcement. Disponível em: https://www.mondaq.com/arbitration-dispute-resolution/1033446/asymmetrical-arbitration-agreement-validity-and-enforcement. Acesso em: 10/06/2022.
USTINOV, Iurii. Unilateral Arbitration Clauses: Legal Validy. Master’s Thesis, LLM International Business Law in Tilburg University. Supervisor: Professor Erik Vermeulen. 2016.
WHYTOCK, Christopher A. The Evolving Forum Shopping System. Cornell Law Review, vol. 96, Issue 3, 2011.
ZELST, Bas van. Unilateral Option Arbitration clauses: An unequivocal choice for arbitration under the ECHR? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 25(1). 2018, pp. 77-86.