Discricionariedade estatal para determinar interesses de segurança nacional no comércio exterior uma análise do artigo XXI.(b).III do Acordo Geral sobre Comércio e Tarifas - GATT
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
O artigo XXI.(b).III do GATT dispõe da exceção de segurança em guerra ou emergências nas relações internacionais. O problema de pesquisa do trabalho trata dos limites à discricionariedade em emergências internacionais. Assim, com ênfase no caso “Russia — Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit”, será verificada a jurisdição para revisão de legalidade, os limites ao julgamento do mérito, a possibilidade de aplicação do princípio da boa-fé e de exigir o ônus da prova como critério objetivo. Além disso, o trabalho sugere possibilidades de desenvolvimento da jurisprudência com base em interpretações do Direito Internacional Público e do Direito dos
Investimentos.
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
Referências
AYRES, Glyn; MITCHELL, Andrew. General and Security Exceptions under the GATT and GATS. In: CARR, Indira; BHUIYAN, Jahid; ALAM, Shawkat (edit.). International Trade Law and WTO. Sidney: Federation Press, 2012. p. 228-268.
BOGDANOVA, Iryna. Adjudication of the GATT Security Clause: To Be or Not to Be, This is the Question. World Trade Institute Working Paper, Mar. 2019. Disponível em: https://www.wti.org/research/publications/1208/adjudication-of-thegatt-security-clause-to-be-or-not-to-be-this-is-the-question/. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
BOGDANOVA, Iryna. The WTO Panel Ruling on the National Security Exception: Has the Panel ‘Cut’ the Baby in Half? EJIL Talk, Apr. 12, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-wto-panel-ruling-on-thenationalsecurity-exception-has-the-panel-cut-the-baby-in-half/. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2021
BOKLAN, D.; BAHRI, A. The First WTO's Ruling on National Security Exception: Balancing Interests or Opening Pandora's Box?. World Trade Review, v. 19, n. 1, p. 123-136, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745619000430.
BONNAN, Regis. The GATT Security Exception in a Dispute Resolution Context: Necessity or Incompatibility?. Currents International Trade LawJournal, v. 3, p. 449-478, 2010.
CANN, Wesley A. Jr. Creating Standards and Accountability for the Use of the WTO Security Exception: Reducing the Role of Power-Based Relations and Establishing a New Balance Between Sovereignty and Multilateralism. Yale Journal of International Law, v. 26, p. 413-485. 2001. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/yjil/vol26/iss2/7. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
CHENG, Bin. General Principles Of Law As Applied By International Courts And Tribunals. Londres: Stevens & Sons Ltd., 1953.
COOK, Graham. A Digest of WTO Jurisprudence of Public International Law Concepts and Principles. Genebra: Cambridge University Press, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316212691.
DESIERTO, Diane A. Necessity and National Emergency Clauses: Sovereignty in Modern Treaty Interpretation. Nijhoff: Brill, Jan. 2012. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004218536.
DESIERTO, Diane A. Protean ‘National Security’ in Global Trade Wars, Investment Walls, and Regulatory Controls: Can ‘National Security’ Ever Be Unreviewable in International Economic Law?. EJIL Talk, Apr. 2, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.ejiltalk.org/national-security-defenses-in-tradewars-and-investment-walls-us-v-china-and-eu-v-us/. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2021.
GATT. Contracting Parties Nineteenth Session. Doc. GATT/SR.19/12, 1961. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/GG/SR/19-12.PDF. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2021.
GATT. Contracting Parties Sixth Session. Doc. GATT/CP.6/5, 1951. Disponível em:REVISTA DO REVISTA DO IBRAC Número 2 - 2021 https://www.wto.org/gatt_docs/English/SULPDF/90070309.pdf. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2021.
GATT. Contracting Parties Third Session. Doc. GATT/CP.3/33, 1949. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/gatt_docs/English/SULPDF/90320183.pdf. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2021.
GATT. Decision Concerning Article XXI, L/5426, Nov. 30, 1982. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/gatt_docs/english/SULPDF/91000212.pdf. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2021.
GATT. Minute of the meeting Held in the Centre William Rappard, GATT Doc. C/M/157, May 7, 1982. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/GG/C/M157.PDF. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
GATT. Minutes of Meeting - Held in the Palais des Nations, Geneva, Doc. C/M/109, Oct. 31, 1975. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/GG/C/M109.PDF. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2021.
GATT. Portugal Accession, Doc. L/1764, 1962. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/gatt_docs/English/SULPDF/90750286.pdf. Acesso em:
mar. 2021.
GATT. Sweden—Import Restrictions on Certain Footwear, L/4250, Nov. 17, 1975. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/GG/L4399/4250.PDF. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2021.
GATT. Trade Measures Taken by the European Community against the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, L/6948, Communication, Dec. 2,1991. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/gatt_docs/English/SULPDF/91600060.pdf. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
GATT. Trade Restrictions Affecting Argentina Applied for Non-Economic Reasons, Communication, Doc. L/5336, June 15, 1982. Disponível em:https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/GG/L5399/5336.PDF. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
GATT. Trade Restrictions Affecting Argentina Applied for Non-economic Reasons, Communication, Doc. L/5319/Rev.1, May 18, 1982. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/GG/L5399/5319R1.PDF. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
GATT. United States – Imports of Sugar from Nicaragua, L/5607, Panel Report, Mar. 2, 1984. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/gatt_e/83sugar.pdf. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
GATT. United States – Restrictions on Exports to Czechoslovakia, CP.3/SR22, Record of the Twenty-second meeting, June 8, 1949. Disponívelem: https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/GG/GATTCP3/SR22.PDF. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
GATT. United States – Trade Measures Affecting Nicaragua, L/6053, Panel Report, Oct. 13, 1986. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/gatt_docs/English/SULPDF/91240197.pdf. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
GOLDSTEIN, J. Creating GATT Rules: Politics, Institutions, and American Policy. In: RUGGIE, John (edit.). Multilateralism Matters. Nova York:Columbia University Press, 1993. p. 201-232.
GREENWOOD, Christopher. The Concept of War in Modern International Law. Cambridge University Press, v. 36, n. 2, p. 283-306, 1987. DOI:10.1093/iclqaj/36.2.283.
HAHN, Michael J. Vital Interests and the Law of GATT: An Analysis of GATT's Security Exception. Michigan Journal of International Law,
Michigan, v. 12, p. 558-620, 1991. Disponível em: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol12/iss3/3. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID). CMS Gas Transmission Company v. Argentine Republic, ICSID case No. ARB/01/8, Award of 12 May 2005. Disponível em: https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0184.pdf. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID). Sempra Energy Int’l v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case
No. Arb 02/16, Decision on the Argentine Republic’s Application for Annulment of the Award of 29 June 2010. Disponível em: https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0776.pdf. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID). Continental Casualty Company v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case no. ARB/03/9, Award of 5 Sept. 2008. Disponível em: https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0228.pdf. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID). LG&E Energy Corp., LG&E Capital Corp., and LG&E International, Inc .v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1, Decision on Liability, Oct 3, 2006. Disponível em: https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0460.pdf. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES (ICSID). Marfin Investment Group Holdings S.A. et al. v. Republic of Cyprus, ICSID Case No. ARB/13/27, Award, July 26, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.italaw.com/sites/default/files/casedocuments /italaw10149.pdf. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ). Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan: New Zealand intervening) Written Observations by NewZealand, 4 April 2013. Disponível em: https://www.icjcij.org/public/files/case-related/148/17386.pdf. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ). Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v. France), Judgement, 2008.Disponível em: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/136/136-20080604-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ). Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters (Djibouti v. France), Declaration of
Judge Kenneth Keith, 2008. Disponível em: https://www.icjcij.org/public/files/case-related/136/136-20080604-JUD-01-06-EN.pdf.Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ). Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. Estados Unidos da
America), Judgement, 1986. Disponível em: https://www.icjcij.org/public/files/case-related/70/070-19860627-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE (ICJ). Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America), Judgement, 2003. Disponívelem: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/90/090-20031106-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
INTERNATIONAL LAW COMISSION. Draft articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, 2001. Disponível em:
https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ddb8f804.html. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
JÜRGEN, Kurtz. Adjudging the Exceptional at International Law: Security, Public Order and Financial Crisis. Society of International Economic Law, Jul. 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1154702. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
KNOLL, David D. The Impact of Security Concerns upon International Economic Law. Syracuse J. Int'l L. & Com.Syracuse, v. 11, p. 587-624, 1984.Disponível em: https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1201&context=jilc. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
LOBSINGER, Eric J. Diminishing borders in trade and terrorism: An examination of regional applicability of GATT article 21 national securitytrade sanctions. ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law, v. 13, n. 1, p. 99-138, 2006.
MOON, William. Essential Security Interests in International Investment Agreements. Journal of International Economic Law, v. 15, n. 2, p. 481-502, Apr. 2012. DOI: 10.1093/jiel/jgs024.
NAGY, Csongor István. World Trade, Imperial Fantasies and Protectionism: Can You Really Have Your Cake and Eat It Too?. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, v. 26, n. 1, p. 87-132, 2019. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3363951. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2021.
NOLAN, Michael D.; SOURGENS, Frederic G. The Limits of Discretion? Self-Judging Emergency Clauses in International Investment Agreements. In: SAUVANT, Karl P. (edit.). Yearbook of International Investment Law & Policy 2010-2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. p. 363-413.
PAUWELYN, Joost. The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How far can we go?. American Journal of International Law, v. 95 , n. 3, p. 535-578, 2001.
PELC, Krzysztof J. Making and bending international rules: The design of exceptions and escape clauses in trade law. Nova York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
PERMANENT COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE (PCIJ). Case of the S.S. Lotus (Frande v. Turkey), Judgement, 1927, series A, No. 10. Disponível em:http://www.worldcourts.com/pcij/eng/decisions/1927.09.07_lotus.htm. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2021.
RANJAN, Prabhash. COVID-19, India and Indirect Expropriation: Is the Police Powers Doctrine a Reliable Defence?. Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, v. 13, n. 1, p. 205-228, May 2020. Disponível em: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3617770. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2021.
REINISCH, August. Necessity in International Investment Arbitration: An Unnecessary Split of Opinions in Recent ICSID Cases. Journal of World. Investment & Trade, v. 8, p. 191-201, 2007.
SANKLECHA, Jay Manoj. The limitations on the invocation of self-judging clauses in the context of WTO dispute settlement. Indian Journal ofInternational Law, v. 59, p. 77-109, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40901-019-00108-6.
SCHILL, Stephan; BRIESE, Robyn. If the State Considers: Self-Judging Clauses In International Dispute Settlement. In: WOLFRUM, Rüdiger (edit.). Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law. Nijhoff: Brill, 2009. v. 13, p. 61-140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18757413-90000037.
SCHLOEMANN, Hannes L.; OHLHOFF, Stefan. ‘Constitutionalization’ and Dispute Settlement in the WTO: National Security as an Issue of Competence. The American Journal of International Law, v. 93, n. 2, p. 424-451, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2997999.
SIEGEL, Deborah E. Legal Aspects of the IMF/WTO Relationship: The Fund’s Articles of Agreement and the WTO Agreements. American Journalof International Law, v. 96, n. 3, p. 561-599, 2002.
TRYBUS, M. The EC Treaty as an Instrument of European Defence Integration: Judicial Scrutinny of Defence and Security Exceptions. CommonMarket Law Review, v. 39, p. 1347-1369, 2002.
UNITED NATIONS REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS (UNRIAA). Sugar Company (United States v. Germany), Decision of 1 November 1923, vol. VII. Disponível em: https://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_VII/44-63.pdf. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
UNITED NATIONS REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS (UNRIAA). Trail Smelter case (United States, Canada), Decision
of 16 April 1938, vol. III. Disponível em: https://legal.un.org/riaa/cases/vol_III/1905-1982.pdf. Acesso em: 31 mar.2021.
UNITED NATIONS. Economic and Social Council, Final Act, GATT and Protocol of Provisional Application, Doc. E/PC/T/214/Add.1/Rev.1, 1947.Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/UN/EPCT/214A1R1.PDF. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
UNITED NATIONS. Economic and Social Council, Preparatory Committee of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment, Thirty-Third Meeting of Commission A, Declaration of US Delegate JM Leddy , Doc. E/PC/T/A/PV/33, 1947. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/UN/EPCT/APV-33.PDF. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
UNITED NATIONS. Economic and Social Council, Preparatory Committee of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment, Thirty-Third Meeting of Commission A, Doc. E/PC/T/A/PV/33, 1947. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/UN/EPCT/APV-33.PDF. Acesso em: 31 mar.2021.
UNITED NATIONS. Economic and Social Council, Preparatory Committee of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment, Thirty-Third Meeting of Commission A, Doc E/PC/T/196, September Draft, 1947. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/UN/EPCT/196.PDF. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
UNITED NATIONS. Economic and Social Council, Preparatory Committee of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment, EleventhMeeting of the Tariff Agreement Committee, Doc. E/PC/T/TAC/PV/11, 1947. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/UN/EPCT/TACPV-11.PDF. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
UNITED NATIONS. Economic and Social Council, Preparatory Committee of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Employment, Thirty-Third Meeting of Commission A, Doc. E/PC/T/A/SR/33, 1947. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/gattdocs/q/UN/EPCT/ASR-33.PDF. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
UNITED NATIONS. General Assembly Resolution No. 68/262. Territorial integrity of Ukraine, 27 Mar. 2014. Disponível em: https://www.securitycouncilreport.org/atf/cf/%7B65BFCF9B-6D27-4E9C-8CD3-CF6E4FF96FF9%7D/a_res_68_262.pdf. Acesso em: 01 abr. 2021;
UNITED NATIONS. General Assembly Resolution No. 71/205. Situation of human rights in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, Dec. 19, 2016. Disponível em: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/858544?ln=en. Acesso em: 01 abr. 2021
UNITED NATIONS. Security Council resolution 687, Apr. 3, 1991. Disponível em: https://www.un.org/Depts/unmovic/documents/687.pdf.Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Departament of State. Proposals for Expansion of World Trade and Employment, Nov. 1945. Disponível em:http://www.worldtradelaw.net/document.php?id=misc/ProposalsForExpansi onOfWorldTradeAndEmployment.pdf. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2021.
VANDEVELDE, Kenneth J. The first bilateral investment treaties: U.S. postwar friendship, commerce, and navigation treaties. Nova York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
WEISS, Martin A. Arab League Boycott of Israel. Washington: Congressional Research Service, Ago. 2017. Disponível em: https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/59c37d214.pdf. Acesso em: 10 mar. 2021.
WRIGHT, Richard W. Causation, Responsibility, Risk, Probability, Naked Statistics, and Proof: Pruning the Bramble Bush by Clarifying the Concepts.Iowa Law Review, v. 73, p. 1001-1077, 1988.
WTO. Russia - Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), DS512, European Union Third Party Written Submission, 2017. Disponível em: https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2018/february/tradoc_156602.pdf. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
WTO. Russia - Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Doc. WT/DS512/3, Request for the establishment of a panel by Ukraine. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/51 2-3.pdf&Open=True. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
WTO. Russia - Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Doc. WT/DS512/R/Add.1, Report of the Panel - Addendum, 2019. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/51 2RA1.pdf&Open=True. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
WTO. Russia - Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Doc. WT/DS512/R, Report of the Panel, 2019. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009-DP.aspx?language=E&CatalogueIdList=253739,252975,252976,248421,240333,236742,234478,231517,231365,231300&CurrentCatalogueIdIndex=1&FullTextHash=&HasEnglishRecord=True&HasFrenchRecord=True&HasSpanishRecord=True. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
WTO. China—Measures Related to the Exportation of Various Raw Materials, WT/DS394/R, WT/DS395/R, WT/DS398/R, Panel report, July 5,2011. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news11_e/394_395_398r_e.htm. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
WTO. Dispute settlement activity: some figures. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispustats_e.htm. Acesso em:31 mar. 2021.
WTO. GATT 1994. Article XXI (Jurisprudence), Security Exceptions. In: WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION (WTO). WTO Analytical Index: Guideto
WTO Law and Practice. Genebra: World Trade Organization, 2012. p. 600. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/gatt_ai_e/art21_e.pdf. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
WTO. GATT 1994. Provisional Application of the General Agreement of 1947. In: WTO. WTO Analytical Index: Guide to WTO Law and Practice.Genebra: World Trade Organization, 2012. p. 1071-1084. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/gatt_ai_e/prov_appl_gen_agree_e.pdf. Acesso em: 01 abr. 2021.
WTO. General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade - GATT, 1994. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/english/docs_e/legal_e/legal_e.htm. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
WTO. Korea – Measures Affecting Imports of Fresh, Chilled and Frozen Beef (United States of America v Korea), WT/DS161/AB/R, WT/DS169/AB/R,Report of the Appellate Body, Dec. 11, 2000. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009-DP.aspx?language=E&CatalogueIdList=28643,66170,107599,12458,13372,22203,110283,19005,7858,46659&CurrentCatalogueIdIndex=3&FullTextHash=&HasEnglishRecord=True&HasFrenchRecord=True&HasSpanishRecord=True. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
WTO. Russia - Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), DS512, Third-Party Oral Statement of the United States of America, 25 Jan. 2018. Disponível em: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/enforcement/DS/US.3d.Pty.Stmt.%28as%20delivered%29.fin.%28public%29.pdf. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021
WTO. Russia - Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), DS512, Third-Party Oral Statement of Australia, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/ds512-australiasthird-party-oral-statement-240118.pdf. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
WTO. Russia - Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit (Ukraine v. Russian Federation), Doc. WT/DS512/1, Request for consultations by Ukraine. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/SS/directdoc.aspx?filename=q:/WT/DS/51 2-1.pdf&Open=True. Acesso em: 30 mar. 2021.
WTO. United States – Restrictions on Imports of Tuna (México v. Estados Unidos da América), DS29/R, Panel Report. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/gatt_e/92tuna.pdf. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
WTO. United States-Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products, Doc. WT/DS58/AB/R, Report of the Appellate Body, Nov. 1998. Disponível em: https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/FE_S_S009- DP.aspx?language=E&CatalogueIdList=49069,73647,22613,31576,97612,43205,14994,1751,52902,34963&CurrentCatalogueIdIndex=2&FullTextHash=&HasEnglishRecord=True&HasFrenchRecord=True&HasSpanishRecord=True. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.
YOO, Ji Yeong; AHN, Dukgeun. Security Exceptions in the WTO System:Bridge or Bottle-Neck for Trade and Security?. Journal of International Economic Law, Oxford, v. 19, n. 2, p. 417-444, out. 2015. Disponível em:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2809074. Acesso em: 31 mar. 2021.