O Déficit democrático no Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias da OMC perspectivas à luz de um Tribunal Arbitral “Ad Hoc”
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Este artigo traz reflexões advindas das mudanças propostas pelo Governo Trump no Sistema de Solução de Controvérsias da Organização Mundial do Comércio, principalmente no tocante à possibilidade de dissolução do Órgão de Apelação e os impactos que isso traria para os PaísesMembros menos desenvolvidos, os “Least Developed Countries” (LDC). Para tanto, através do método procedimental bibliográfico, expõe o já existente déficit democrático na OMC e as razões para as dificuldades de acesso à
solução de controvérsias e por meio do estudo exploratório e do método dedutivo, discorre acerca de como as mudanças propostas pelo governo norteamericano podem agravar o déficit
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
Referências
ABBOTT, Roderick. Are developing countries deterred from using the WTO dispute settlement system? Participation of developing countries in the DSM in the years 1995-2005, ECIPE Working Paper, Brussels, n. 01, 2007.
ACWL. WTO Disputes: Assistance in WTO dispute settlement proceedings since July 2001. [S. l.], 2021. Disponível em https://www.acwl.ch/wtodisputes/ Acesso em: 11 jul. 2021.
ANYIWE, Linimose Nzeriuno; EKHATOR, Eghosa Osa. Developing Countries and the WTO Dispute Resolution System: A Legal Assessment and Review. Journal of Sustainable Development Law and Policy, v. 2, n. 1, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.ajol.info/index.php/jsdlp/article/view/122604 . Acesso em: 11 jul. 2021.
ARSLANIAN, Regis P. O recurso à seção 301 da legislação de comércio norte-americana e a aplicação de seus dispositivos contra o Brasil. Brasília: Instituto Rio Branco, 1994.
BOHANES, Jan; GARZA, Fernanda. Going Beyond Stereotypes: Participation of Developing Countries in WTO Dispute Settlement. Trade, Law and Development, v. 4, n. 1, 2012.
BOWN, Chad P.; KEYNES, Soumaya. Why Trump shot the Sheriffs: The end of WTO dispute settlement 1.0. Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper, Washington, n. 20-4, mar. 2020.
BOWN, Chad P.; McCULLOCH, Rachel. Developing Countries, Dispute Settlement and the Advisory Centre on WTO Law, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, v. 19, n. 1, 2010. Disponível em: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/19938/WPS5168.pdf;sequence=1. Acesso em: 10 jul. 2021.
BRASIL. Ministério das Relações Exteriores. Rodada de Doha da Organização Mundial do Comércio. Brasília, [s. d.]. Disponível em: http://antigo.itamaraty.gov.br/pt-BR/politica-externa/diplomacia-economicacomercial-e-financeira/694-a-rodada-de-doha-da-omc. Acesso: em 11 out. 2020.
BRONCKERS, Marco; VAN DEN BROEK, Financial Compensation in the WTO: Improving the Remedies of WTO Dispute Settlement, Journal of International Economic Law, v. 8, n. 1, 2005. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/31047267_Financial_Compensation_in_the_WTO_Improving_the_Remedies_of_WTO_Dispute_Settlement. Acesso em: 14 jul. 2021.
ESTADOS UNIDOS. Congresso dos Estados Unidos. WTO Dispute Settlement Review Commission Act. Washington: Government Printing Office, 1995. Disponível em: https://www.congress.gov/bill/104thcongress/house-bill/1434. Acesso em: 01 jul. 2021.
ESTADOS UNIDOS. Senado dos Estados Unidos. Dispute Settlements in the WTO. Washington: Government Printing Office, 2000. Disponível em: https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/hrg106629.pdf. Acesso em 01 jul. 2021.
GERHART, Peter M.; KELLA, Archana Seema. Power and Preferences: Developing Countries and the Role of the WTO Appellate Body. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation, v. 30, n. 3, 2005.
GREENWALD, John. WTO Dispute Settlement: an Exercise in Trade Law Legislation? Journal of International Economic Law, v. 6, n. 1, p. 113–124, 2003.
INGNAM, Kumar. Making WTO Dispute Settlement System Useful for LDCs. Kathmandu School of Law Review, v. 6, n. 1, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.nepjol.info/index.php/kslr/article/download/30767/24547/. Acesso em: 11 jul. 2021.
INÍCIO do recesso de verão na OMC marca a falta de esperanças de um acordo em Doha. Pontes entre o comércio e o desenvolvimento sustentável, v. 3, n. 4, ago. 2007. Disponível em: http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/pontes/issue/view/4281/2276. Acesso em: 11 jul. 2021.
KHOURY, Maya El. Prospects of Reform of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism, Indonesia Journal of International Law, v. 8, n. 3, 2011. Disponível em: http://ijil.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/viewFile/300/pdf_195 . Acesso em: 11 jul. 2021.
KONKEN, Lauren. Silence is Golden? Revisiting Third Party Participation in World Trade Organization Litigation. Program of the 12th Annual Conference on The Political Economy of International Organization, 2019, Disponível em: https://www.peio.me/wpcontent/uploads/2019/01/PEIO12_paper_64.pdf. Acesso em: 13 jul. 2021.
LANOSZKA, Anna. Autonomy and Domination within the Global Trade System: Developing Countries in the Quest for a Democratic WTO, Institute on Globalization and the Human Condition - Working Paper Series 06/6, 2006. Disponível em: https://globalization.mcmaster.ca/research/publications/workingpapers/2006/ighc-wps_06-6_lanoszka.pdf Acesso em 14 jul. 2021.
LOPES, Inez. Dispute Settlement Body of the WTO: access to developing countries?. University of Brasilia Law Journal. v. 01, n. 02, p. 33-65, dez. 2014.
MEAGHER, Niall. Representing Developing Countries before the WTO: The Role of the Advisory Centre on WTO Law (ACWL). Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper, n. 02, 2015. Disponível em: http://dianan.iue.it:8080/bitstream/handle/1814/35747/RSCAS_PP_2015_02.pdf?sequen
ce=1&isAllowed=y Acesso em 11 jul. 2021
MICHALOPOULUS, Constantine. The Developing Countries in the WTO. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.
NOTTAGE, Hunter: Developing countries in the WTO Dispute Settlement System, GEG Working Paper, Oxford, n. 47, 2009. Disponível em: https://www.geg.ox.ac.uk/publication/geg-wp-200947-developing-countrieswto-dispute-settlement-system. Acesso em: 10 jul. 2021.
OECD. The Participation of Developing Countries in Global Value Chains: Implications for Trade and Trade Related Policies. OECD Trade Policy Paper, n. 179, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.oecd.org/countries/centralafricanrepublic/ParticipationDeveloping-Countries-GVCs-Policy-Note-April-2015.pdf Acesso em 13 jul. 2021
PETERSMANN, Ernst-Ulrich. Justice as Conflict Resolution: Proliferation, Fragmentation, and Decentralization of Dispute Settlement in International Trade. Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository, v. 27, n. 2, 2006. Disponível em: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1193&context=jil . Acesso em: 10 jul. 2021.
REICH, Arie. The Effectiveness of the WTO Dispute Settlement System: A Statistical Analysis. EUI Working Paper LAW, n. 11, 2017. Disponível em: https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/47045/LAW_2017_11.pdf. Acesso em: 11 jul. 2021.
SHAFFER, Gregory. The challenges of WTO law: strategies for developing country adaptation. World Trade Review, jul. 2006. Disponível em: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Petros_Mavroidis/publication/4857630_El_mess_in_TELMEX_a_comment_on_Mexicomeasures_affecting_telecommunications_services/links/54d1de920cf28370d0e14fec/El-mess-in-TELMEX-a-comment-on-Mexico-measures-affecting-telecommunications-services.pdf#page=25. Acesso em: 10 jul. 2021.
THORSTENSEN, Vera; RAMOS, Daniel; MULLER, Carolina; BERTOLACCINI, Fernanda. Acessão da China à OMC: a questão da economia de não mercado. [S. l.], 2012. Disponível em: https://bibliotecadigitalfgv.br/dspace/bitstream/handle/10438/16363/CNI%20-%20Acess%C3%A3o%20da%20China%20na%20OMC.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Acesso em: 10 jul. 2021.
UNITED NATIONS. LDC Portal. Advisory Centre on WTO Law. [S. l.], 2019. Disponível em: https://www.un.org/ldcportal/advisory-centre-on-wto-law-acwl/. Acesso em: 11 jul. 2021.
VAN DER BORGHT, Kim. Justice for all the Dispute Settlement System of the World Trade Organization? Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, v. 31, n. 3, 2011. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1064&context=gjicl. Acesso em: 10 jul. 2021.
WTO. Chronological list of disputes cases. [S. l.], 2021a. Disponível em https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_status_e.htm Acesso em: 11 jul. 2021.
WTO. Dispute Settlement. [S. l.], 2021b. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_e.htm. Acesso em: 11 jul. 2021.
WTO. Disputes by Member. [S. l.], 2021c. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/dispu_by_country_e.htm Acesso em: 11 jul. 2021.
WTO. DS285: United States - Measures Affecting the Cross-Border Supply of Gambling and Betting Services. [S. 1], 2021d. Disponível em https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds285_e.htm Acesso em: 11 jul. 2021.
WTO. GATT disputes: 1948-1955. [S. l.], 2021e. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/gatt4895vol1_e.pdf Acesso em: 11 jul. 2021.
WTO. Least-Developed Countries. [S. l.], 2021f. Disponível em: https://www.wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/org7_e.htm Acesso em: 11 jul. 2021.
WTO. Special and differential treatment provisions. [S. l.], 2021g. Disponível em https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/devel_e/dev_special_differential_provisions_e.htm Acesso em: 11 jul. 2021.