Rastejando em direção ao antitruste comportamental a (limitada) experiência brasileira e os casos europeus contra o Google como experimento de arquitetura da escolha online

Conteúdo do artigo principal

Julia Krein
Vitória Oliveira

Resumo

O direito concorrencial está dentre os campos do direito que mais se amparam em observações econômicas. A economia comportamental revolucionou o pensamento econômico no início do século XXI ao desafiar a premissa de que os agentes econômicos são plenamente racionais. Apesar disso, autoridades concorrenciais continuam a operar predominantemente sob os parâmetros da Escola de Chicago, o que inclui a premissa da racionalidade perfeita. Há, contudo, cada vez mais evidências de que essa abordagem é insuficiente para tratar dos desafios de uma era digital. Nesse contexto, este artigo apresenta uma visão geral das principais observações comportamentais e de economia da escolha (e seu lado negativo, as dark patterns), e explora seus impactos sobre publicações de autoridades concorrenciais, bem como decisões no Brasil e na União Europeia. A partir dessas análises, observa-se os remédios europeus em casos contra o Google como experimentos iniciais (que se utilizam de experiência passada com a Microsoft) de arquitetura da escolha por uma autoridade concorrencial, explorando suas possíveis lições,  particularmente a necessidade de que autoridades considerem exercer um papel mais ativo na concepção de alternativas que preservem o poder de escolha.

Detalhes do artigo

Como Citar
Krein, J., & Oliveira, V. (2023). Rastejando em direção ao antitruste comportamental: a (limitada) experiência brasileira e os casos europeus contra o Google como experimento de arquitetura da escolha online. Revista Do IBRAC, 2(2), 31–62. Recuperado de https://revista.ibrac.org.br/index.php/revista/article/view/199
Edição
Seção
Artigos
Biografia do Autor

Julia Krein

Mestranda em Direito Comercial na Universidade de São Paulo (2023), bacharela em Direito pela mesma instituição (2018). Advogada no Barbosa Müssnich Aragão Advogados.

Vitória Oliveira

Doutoranda em Direito Econômico e Economia Política na Faculdade de Direito da USP (2022), bacharela em Direito pela mesma instituição (2019). Pesquisadora do Projeto “A Regulação dos sistemas alimentares no Brasil”, com apoio do Instituto Ibirapitanga e O’Neill Institute Global Center for Legal Innovation on Food Environments da Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Georgetown

Referências

ACM. Protection of the online consumer: Boundaries of online persuasion, 2020. Available at: https://www.acm.nl/sites/default/files/documents/2020-02/acm-guidelines-on-the-protection-of-the-online-consumer.pdf. Access on 3 September 2023.

AZEVEDO, Paulo F. Economia comportamental e antitruste: deu match? In: ZINGALES, Nicolo. FARANI, Paula A. (org.) A aplicação do direito antitruste em ecossistemas digitais. Rio de Janeiro: FGV Direito Rio, 2022, pp. 111-137.

BECKETT, Samantha. Why your local grocery store is designed like a casino. The Oakland Press: January 2018, available at: https://www.theoaklandpress.com/2018/01/09/why-your-local-grocery-store-is-designed-likea-casino/. Access on 8 September 2023.

BRAIDO, Luis H. B. Desafios à utilização da economia comportamental no antitruste. In: ZINGALES, Nicolo. FARANI, Paula A. (org.) A aplicação do direito antitruste em ecossistemas digitais. Rio de Janeiro: FGV Direito Rio, 2022, pp. 111-137.

CADE. Chairman Alexandre Barreto de Souza’s vote in Administrative Procedure No. 08700.000066/2016-90 (Defendants: Araguaia Indústria Comércio e Serviços Ltda. – EPP; Corning Comunicações Ópticas S.A.; Corning Incorporated and others), 2021.

CADE. Commissioner Cristiane Alkmin Junqueira Schmidt in Administrative Procedure No. 08012.006667/2009-35 (Defendants: Cial Comércio e Indústria de Alimentos Ltda.; Comissária Aérea Rio de Janeiro Ltda. and others), 2018.

CADE. Commissioner Eduardo Pontual Ribeiro’s vote in Administrative Procedure No. 08012.010215/2007-96 (Defendants: Ademir Antônio Onzi, Darci José Tonietto, Deunir Luis Argenta, Evaristo Antônio Andreazza and others), 2012.

CADE. Commissioner Paula Farani Azevedo Silveira’s vote in Administrative Procedure No. 08012.010483/2011-94 (Defendants: Google Inc. and Google Brasil Internet Ltda., 2019.

CADE. Commissioner Paulo Burnier da Silveira’s vote in Administrative Procedure No. 08012.002673/2007-51 (Defendants: Volkswagen do Brasil Indústria de Veículos Automotivos Ltda.; Fiat Automóveis S.A.; and Ford Motor Company Brasil Ltda), 2017.

CADE. Papel da economia comportamental nas análises antitruste é tema de seminário do Cade. 30 September 2020, available at: https://www.gov.br/cade/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/papel-da-economia-comportamental-nas-analises-antitruste-e-tema-de-seminario-do-cade. Access on 3 September 2023.

CADE. Termo de Referência. Proceeding No. 08700.002020/2022-53, 2022.

CMA. Online Choice Architecture: How digital design can harm competition and consumers, 2022. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1066524/Online_choice_architecture_discussion_paper.pdf. Access on 3 September 2023.

CMA; ICO. Harmful design in digital markets: How Online Choice Architecture practices can undermine consumer choice and control over personal information, 2023. Available at: https://www.drcf.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0024/266226/Harmful-Design-in-Digital-Markets-ICOCMA-joint-position-paper.pdf. Access on 3 September 2023.

CNIL. Shaping Choices in the Digital World - From dark patterns to data protection: the influence of UX/UI design on user empowerment, 2019, p. 14. Available at: https://www.cnil.fr/sites/cnil/files/2023-06/cnil_ip_report_06_shaping_choices_in_the_digital_world.pdf. Access on 3 September 2023.

COOPER, James C.. KOVACIC, William E. Behavioral Economics and Its Meaning for Antitrust Agency Decision Making, 8 J.L. Econ. & Pol’y 779, 2012.

DEFRA. Behavioural Economics in Defra: Applying Theory to Policy, 2013. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/223835/pb13986-behavioural-economics-defra.pdf. Access on September 03, 2023.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Behavioural study on unfair commercial practices in the digital environment Dark patterns and manipulative personalisation, 2022. Available at:https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/606365bc-d58b-11ec-a95f-01aa75ed71a1/languageen/format-PDF/source-257599418. Access on 3 September 2023.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Commission Decision (Case COMP/C-3/37.792 - Microsoft), May 2004.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Commission Decision (Case COMP/C-3/39.530 - Microsoft (Tying)), December 2009.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Commission Decision (Case AT.39740 - Google Search (Shopping)), June 2017.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Commission Decision (Case AT.40099 - Google Android), July 2018.

FCA. Applying behavioural economics at the Financial Conduct Authority, 2013. Available at: https://www.fca.org.uk/publication/occasional-papers/occasional-paper-1.pdf. Access on 3 September 2023.

FLETCHER, Amelia. The EU Google Decisions: extreme enforcement or the tip of the behavioral iceberg? Competition Policy International. January 2019. Available at: https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/theeu-google-decisions-extreme-enforcement-or-the-tip-of-the-behavioral-iceberg/. Access on 3 September 2023.

FORBRUKERRÅDET. Deceived by Design: How Tech Companies Use Dark Patterns to Discourage Us from Exercising Our Rights to Privacy, 2018. Available at: https://www.forbrukerradet.no/undersokelse/no-undersokelsekategori/deceived-by-design. Access on September 3, 2023.

GOOGLE. About the choice screen. Android. 12 June 2023 (last update). https://www.android.com/choicescreen/. Access on 10 September 2023.

HECKMAN, Oliver. Changes to Google Shopping in Europe. Google Ads & Commerce Blog, 27 September 2017. Available at: https://blog.google/products/ads/changes-to-google-shopping-in-europe/.

HÖPPNER, Thomas, Google’s (Non-) Compliance with the EU Shopping Decision (September 28, 2020). Study, Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3700748. Access on 3 September 2023.

HUMMEL, Dennis; MAEDCHE, Alexander. How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics Volume 80, June 2019, Pages 47-58.

KAHNEMAN, Daniel; TVERSKY, Amos. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, New Series, Vol. 185, No. 4157. (Sep. 27, 1974), pp. 1124-1131.

KAHNEMAN, Daniel. KNETSCH, Jack L. THALER, Richard H. Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1., 1991, pp. 193-206.

KAHNEMAN, Daniel; TVERSKY, Amos. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty , 1992, Vol. 5, No. 4 (1992), pp. 297-323.

KAHNEMAN, Daniel. Thinking: fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux: 2013.

KHAN, Lina M. Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox. The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 126, no. 3, 2017, pp. 564-907. Available at: http://www.yalelawjournal.org/note/amazons-antitrust-paradox. Accessed on 8 September 2023.

KLAES, Matthias; SENT, Esther-Mirjam. A conceptual history of the emergence of bounded rationality. History of Political Economy (2005) 37 (1): 27–59.

KONSUMENTVERKET. Barriers to a well-functioning digital market: effects of visual design and information disclosures on consumer detriment, 2021. Available at: https://www.medvetenkonsumtion.se/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Konsumentverket-underlagsrapport-barriers-digital-market.pdf. Access on 3 September 2023.

KUYER, Paul. GORDIJN, Bert. Nudge in perspective: A systematic literature review on the ethical issues with nudging. Rationality and Society, 35(2), 2023, 191-230. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/10434631231155005.

LANCIERI, Filippo. SAKOWSKI, Patricia A. M. Concorrência em mercados digitais: uma revisão dos relatórios especializados. CADE, Documento de Trabalho nº 005/2020. Brasília: 2020. Available at: https://cdn.cade.gov.br/Portal/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/estudoseconomicos/documentos-de-trabalho/2020/documento-de-trabalho-n05-2020-concorrencia-em-mercados-digitais-uma-revisao-dos-relatorios-especializados.pdf. Access on 3 September 2023.

LI, Jessica. NIKOLKA, Till. The Effect of Presumed Consent Defaults on Organ Donation. CESifo DICE Report 4/2016. December, 2016, 90-94. Available at: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/dice-report-2016-4-li-nikolka-december.pdf. Access on 10 September 2023.

LOCKHEIMER, Hiroshi. Complying with the EC’s Android decision. Google Keyword, 16 October 2018, available at: https://blog.google/around-the-globe/google-europe/complying-ecs-android-decision/. Access on 3 September 2023.

OECD. Dark Commercial Patterns: OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 336, 2022. Available at: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/44f5e846-en.pdf?expires=1694340686&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=56968832CC0618F5B7135E2CB1357104. Access on September 3, 2023.

OECD. Integrating Consumer Behaviour Insights in Competition Enforcement: OECD Competition Policy Roundtable Background Note, 2022, p. 8. Available at: www.oecd.org/daf/competition/integrating-consumer-behaviour-insights-in-competition-enforcement-2022.pdf. Access on August 27, 2023.

PYNDYCK, Robert S. RUBINFELD, Daniel S. Microeconomics. 8th edition. Pearson: 2013, chapter 5.6.

REEVES, Amanda P. STUCKE, Maurice E. Behavioral antitrust. Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 86: Iss. 4, Article 7, p. 1532.

RESENDE, Guilherme M. Antitruste comportamental: pronto para o palco principal? Consultor Jurídico, 6 September 2021, available at: https://www.conjur.com.br/2021-set-06/defesa-concorrencia-antritrustecomportamental-pronto-palco-principa. Access on 27 August 2023.

STUCKE, Maurice. Behavioral antitrust and monopolization. UTK Law Faculty Publications, 749, 2012.

THALER, Richard H. Nudge, not sludge. Science, 361(6401), 431-431.

THALER, Richard H. SUNSTEIN, Cass. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Penguin Books, 2008

THALER, Richard H. Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Volume 1, Issue 1, March 1980, Pages 39-60.

ZINGALES, Luigi; ROLNIK, Guy; LANCIERI, Filippo Maria. Final Report, Stigler Committee on Digital Platforms, Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State, 2019, p. 58. Available at: https://www.chicagobooth.edu/-/media/research/stigler/pdfs/digital-platforms---committee-report---stigler-center.pdf. Access on 10 September 2023.